From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 31 08:24:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A69916A4DA; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe02.swip.net [212.247.154.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F5643D45; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:24:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: gvlK0tOCzrqh9CPROFOFPw== X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [193.217.133.87] (HELO [10.0.0.249]) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 247590042; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:24:40 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:24:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20060730141642.D16341@fledge.watson.org> <44CCFC2C.20402@errno.com> <20060730200929.J16341@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060730200929.J16341@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607311024.50537.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: net@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changes in the network interface queueing handoff model X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:24:46 -0000 On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:23, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: Just a comment while the iron is hot: Maybe you can make the network model safe against detach. Currently I see that the processor can be stuck in routines like "if_start" after that "if_free()" has been called. This can be critical for USB ethernet devices. --HPS