From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 02:30:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FA7106564A for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466A08FC17 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1A2U388009389 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1A2U3f9009383; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200902100230.n1A2U3f9009383@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Naram Qashat Cc: Subject: Re: ports/131541: [PATCH] multimedia/vlc: Add xulrunner to USE_GECKO within WITH_VLC_MOZILLA_PLUGIN X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Naram Qashat List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/131541; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Naram Qashat To: "Joseph S. Atkinson" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/131541: [PATCH] multimedia/vlc: Add xulrunner to USE_GECKO within WITH_VLC_MOZILLA_PLUGIN Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:20:31 -0500 Joseph S. Atkinson wrote: > I don't want xulrunner to be the default gecko and the order implies > preference. If you want it to use xulrunner instead of firefox, you need > to specify `WITH_GECKO=xulrunner` somehow (such as in /etc/make.conf or > at build time). > > NOTE: I cannot test that it will actually build and work with xulrunner > at this moment, but it's ultimately the end user's mistake to make if > they choose. It might work one day, but not on the next bump to either > ports. > > If the submitter has no objections, please submit my version instead. No objection to that. And I know it builds with xulrunner as I've done it before. Naram Qashat > Also, while I am here, slay the dragon known as mozilla since it's old > and vulnerable and I have no idea why anyone or anything would still > want to use it (looking at you OpenOffice!). And the same applies to NVU > (the use of which didn't make a lot of sense here anyway here). These > save someone the trouble should they (finally) get purged form ports. > > aka: jsa@wickedmachine.net >