From owner-svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 25 12:23:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962F01065674; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theravensnest.org [109.169.23.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314688FC12; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc1-cwma8-2-0-cust257.7-3.cable.virginmedia.com [82.20.153.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1PBqJkb026873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:52:19 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:52:14 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8665D8BA-6D91-46C6-8DFA-3B0C1F8B5D9E@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202231018.q1NAISrV099085@svn.freebsd.org> <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: Ermal Lu?i , svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232043 - projects/pf/head/sys/contrib/pf/net X-BeenThere: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the src " projects" tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:23:01 -0000 On 25 Feb 2012, at 09:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > I'm about to start improving pf regarding its SMP friendlyness. The > changes are going to be so disruptive, that pretending that we are > a shared code between OpenBSD and FreeBSD won't be possible. At FOSDEM, there was some brief discussion about unifying the various = firewall implementations we have, by providing a common bytecode format = that all sets of firewall rules can be compiled to and (eventually) = providing an LLVM-based JIT for this bytecode. =20 If we're about to irreparably fork pf, perhaps now would be the correct = time to have the discussion about exactly what is required. David=