Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:13:18 -0400 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sysadmin article Message-ID: <20010615001318.F1832@superconductor.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <200106150223.f5F2NLW08368@panix1.panix.com>; from rsi@panix.com on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:23:21PM -0400 References: <200106150223.f5F2NLW08368@panix1.panix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> [010614 22:23] wrote: > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm > > Any obvious reasons why FreeBSD performed so poorly for these people? Because they did benchmarks on systems without tuning. A simple email to the lists asking for help would have probably done a world of difference. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615001318.F1832>