Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:17:07 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, setantae@submonkey.net, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Documenting FreeBSD Officers, Hats, and Working Groups Message-ID: <20030209021707.GA94205@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20030206205228.42486a38.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030206214853.GB17028@submonkey.net> <20030206165535.1503ff12.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030206221455.GC17028@submonkey.net> <20030206174120.0075fcd5.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030206230229.GD18106@submonkey.net> <20030206184047.4b08943a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030207005155.GA67667@intruder.bmah.org> <20030206202110.76ae4e7e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030207013803.GA68113@intruder.bmah.org> <20030206205228.42486a38.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:38:03 -0800 > "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: >=20 > > If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > >=20 > > > Actually, I have been thinking this over a bit now. I'll define a > > > hats.ent file in the internal/ area. This is where we put > > > authortive groups, with their memebers, and their @FreeBSD.org email > > > address. > >=20 > > Hmmm. Now I'm confused. Is this for the Web site? I would have > > expected a hats.sgml in the top-level directory (en/), roughly > > analogous to developers.sgml. > >=20 >=20 > Actually I felt like using in doc/ and www/, however, I don't really > see much use in putting the file in the doc/ tree. I saw your commits. I have two questions...not intended as criticism but just looking for clarification: 1. Why is your entity definition file called "hats.ent" and not "hats.sgml"? File defining entities in the www/ tree seem to have *.sgml extensions (see developers.sgml). I tried to ask you this in a prior message, but apparently I didn't ask very clearly. 2. Why did you define b.* entities for names of developers, rather than use the existing a.* entities defined in developers.sgml? (Yes, I know you added links to email addresses, but you could easily add that to the existing entities too.) Again, this isn't intended as criticism. I'm just trying to learn what your reasoning was, to see if I missed something important. Thanks! Bruce. PS. OK, this one *is* a criticism. Did you do a case-insensitive search-and-replace to change "a." to "b."? If so, consider that=20 "a." (or "A.") occurs in other places than entity names. Ahem. :-) --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Rboi2MoxcVugUsMRAnysAJ4qEEal3hKFI8kGnxgWlfBDeRjb4QCfab3f qRxvkg61jjGhEICDGwo+0FQ= =jS6K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030209021707.GA94205>