Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194508] [MAINTAINER] dns/powerdns-devel: update to 3.4.0,1 Message-ID: <bug-194508-13-M61u0TqJIg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194508-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194508-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194508 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- wait, so there's no difference between powerdns and powerdns-devel? I've got two reactions: 1) It's normally that the -devel version be disabled when it's the same, e.g. set to IGNORE with recommendation to use release version 2) How useful is having two ports anyway? Is it not feasible just to maintainer one port? or in other words, is the -devel port existence really justified? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194508-13-M61u0TqJIg>