From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 1 16:39:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CA8BA1 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from virtual.feral.com (virtual.feral.com [216.224.170.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC6D1E6 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.135.7] (76-14-49-207.sf-cable.astound.net [76.14.49.207]) by virtual.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r31Gcosi020895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 09:38:51 -0700 Message-ID: <5159B81A.4000101@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:38:50 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (virtual.feral.com [216.224.170.83]); Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:38:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:39:59 -0000 On 4/1/2013 9:02 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > users of older hardware usually don't want to upgrade to latest > freebsd kernel and userland. I have several i386 only (Pentium 4 is the newest) that I run FreeBSD-current on, including (up until last week) feral.com itself.