From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 7 15:44:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AA9D32954 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from filter04.peak.org (filter04.peak.org [69.59.194.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.peak.org", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFB9A83 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([207.55.16.112]) by filter04.peak.org ({b5578ef9-c87c-4111-97f7-092309db775d}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20170407154430964_0000 for ; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:44:30 -0700 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3855C62C71 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF9461DA0 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail-mta02.peak.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id k6VQp6MLUHFs for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailproxy-lb-05.peak.org (mailproxy-lb-05.peak.org [207.55.17.95]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3D54D048 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlj by elm.localnet with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cwW3j-000Jie-K9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:44:23 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 12-Current for Raspberry Pi 2? References: <86wpawx4w1.fsf@elm.localnet> <20170407045352.GB51176@geeks.org> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:44:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170407045352.GB51176@geeks.org> (Doug McIntyre's message of "Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:53:52 -0500") Message-ID: <86pogow7c8.fsf@elm.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MAG-OUTBOUND: peakinternet.redcondor.net@207.55.16/22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:44:34 -0000 Doug McIntyre writes: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:39:42PM -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Does anybody know what has happened with the RPi2 for 12-Current? There >> haven't been any snapshots at the website to try out for several weeks >> now. There are snapshots for the RPi-B and the other armv6 boards. Has >> somebody decided to drop it for 12.0 or something? > > If I follow along correctly (eg. on the freebsd-arm mailing list), > > binutils was updated to v2.28 in base, with a different exit code for > an error condition that was silently failing before, but now totally > breaks the build tree for aarch64. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218198 > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2017-March/015957.html > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2017-April/016017.html > > So, the maintainers have to fix the build tree problems. > > compiled in> No, I was asking about the RPi2 instead of the RPi3. The RPi2 is still armv6, so that shouldn't apply to it. Thanks anyways. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org