From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 5 14:56:20 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E5537B419; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gateway.posi.net ([12.236.90.177]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020205225558.YSFT3578.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@gateway.posi.net>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:55:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by gateway.posi.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g15Mtqu20377; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:55:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.posi.net: kbyanc owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:55:52 -0800 (PST) From: Kelly Yancey To: Mark Murray Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" , Alfred Perlstein , , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.c In-Reply-To: <200202052220.g15MKps32595@greenpeace.grondar.org> Message-ID: <20020205145352.W20355-100000@gateway.posi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > > 2) Have the same speed compared to random() (or even faster) > > It is three times slower, according to a cheap benchmark. > This should be a non-issue. How often does a program need to authenticate? I should think it is more important to follow POLA and preserve random()'s state across library calls. Kelly kbyanc@{posi.net,FreeBSD.org} To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message