From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 04:35:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A7C1065670 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [192.147.25.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269BE8FC19 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from 76-205-169-61.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net ([76.205.169.61]:63198 helo=borg) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LNJwh-0000dZ-LX for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:35:09 -0600 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:35:00 -0600 (CST) From: Larry Rosenman Sender: ler@borg To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-LERCTR-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.5/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931 X-LERCTR-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.5/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931 DomainKey-Status: no signature Subject: Bacula: VERY SLOW on SAME host X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:35:10 -0000 Greetings, Somethings changed (Around the 1st of the year?) where my bacula jobs take FOREVER to backup on the same host with the StorageDaemon and Director. If I change it to use 127.0.0.1 instead of the address on the em card, it's fine. If I use the address on the em nics, it's like 4kb/sec as opposed to multi-megabytes/sec. I'm looking for how to find what broke. Other networking to the host is fine, but this is TCP within the same host, but using the IP address on the em interface. I see the TCP Send-Q fill up, and it's extremely slow. What data do you need to help debug this? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893