From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 15:50:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE44A29502; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6411EEE; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 1A793182E; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:50:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Guido Falsi , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13 Message-ID: <20151109155034.GB60954@FreeBSD.org> References: <201506052330.t55NUBZL020965@svn.freebsd.org> <564044BC.5050203@FreeBSD.org> <077EDBDC-8EF1-44FA-9D17-90345C2956F5@adamw.org> <20151109153801.GA60954@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:50:34 -0000 On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:41:43AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 9 Nov, 2015, at 8:38, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I'm still hesitating about "Build with" vs. "Use". I'm thinking of cases > > when GCC bits are required, but not exactly to build things. At this point > > I'm more inclined towards "Use modern GCC (from ports)" but still not 100% > > confident it's the best wording. > > I think the difference there is pedantic, and possibly more confusing. While > it is true that "build with" may not always be accurate, "use" is so generic > as to convey practically nothing. OK, I buy this; after all, "build with" is always applicable to the package itself (ir)regardless of exactly how GCC is being used. > My vote is for "Build with modern GCC (from ports)"[.] Let it be then, +1 on this very wording. ./danfe