Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 08:47:36 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, bde@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Diskslice naming convention? Message-ID: <199509271447.IAA17104@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199509270910.TAA14492@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199509270910.TAA14492@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes: > >> BTW - Are slices named 1-4 or 0-3? > > >1-4, 0 is the compatibility slice. > > There is no slice named 0. Slice _number_ 0 is the compatibility slice. > Slice _number_ 1 is the whole disk. The slices that are _numbered_ 2-31 > are _named_ 1-30. Whoa. I'm lost now w/regards to the compatability slice. How exactly is the compatability slice named, and how does it fit into the 'slice' paradigm? Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509271447.IAA17104>