From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 06:19:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0156C53AB80; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DjJFm6cqTz4ltN; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613801996; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KM27LIMvSwnnoVMfFMxJCn9SH1eot1FRXDVzMYw03FI=; b=hN24TZBWqUxIwNqxDKwIVLjPiiSHP9sj3OEg8hgkXv/YOBhb6dAEUStEu2z/kwI8IdgAX3 3mUYL3NBYcl1HY9v/Mlfhm+DUFsrtN+b3it9nhZvBDAVfoy155IEF3zZQV+nrKP0TpHOJ5 f2i27N2+biZrxxGN4bAypus65r0QDh0Cfrrizl+Ef0vF1zdngZnwZSptyNJU0VHh4aTfKS LdPpUpO0BJ0OC6EW//K5NwPVZhw9ZFMdK1TG9+CN+9bECwKMV2YkaUE8FZYRTzA4aXbW3v l0s+6jnWm2KnN25GJO9oQKnA0GzDtCOe968dx1IkcoanfOA0O9Hn9LvISP4e/w== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id CD5BC10CA8; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:19:56 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Romain Tarti??re Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r566124 - in head/irc: . catgirl Message-ID: <20210220061956.GB66080@FreeBSD.org> References: <202102192353.11JNrMtX005757@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202102192353.11JNrMtX005757@repo.freebsd.org> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613801996; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KM27LIMvSwnnoVMfFMxJCn9SH1eot1FRXDVzMYw03FI=; b=fxLrGFMXPgEzoDTnzQ6KjH5eiOCOo6SJOv7k3sT7ZzEZGc9bW/lM6oh6YROeRwQsWjuDBD 9mFQjazNjnjPPNzwqrf6/oCJxbyYFHN4OM/MA5ESRAxrVTZGLnxrdz0lTYgJ7IOCBY3+14 f1LWSqGFob2cJC5WsT9Gbs7cdyiNjN9g9QkHTkVz6Sjnv/BOlkdLWxWl9TyF1mMgWg7Yjm 4+LTZSkGwfbrtb1GywQ59Nyqdq+v91oNjpS4gSan+4cywL1B8WyfBGt2d/tVqoYfHz85/7 SnymeejD7OCFGI5qba/Y7uCp2FbTf1309VM3S6NY74i83lw42kL9Edsfvr3sww== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1613801996; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cpquRiMzlpYOm9L1V2ZTpHlrKafDVrMA3Nkey6PR+p4idzED9UJMk8dgOrZKXokwCw6ce/ DZxPgkz0N4DDGkSwCXNG9EtGDyTTZ+C+o3/VNm1PZUp8CByWflGEE9x++Czf4jYYklrCtn X6N8hgQTxDbW9vmC7MXtbLbwcWwxpVZvTu7y9N3KhvUPmKXaZD8AjvHrdF/MkgZg/aO0jL rFaNEWUP6fPimMpLDRM0WWbGu6+IvjQUjkagVDjpJOqUckug92XEeb3szqb0X5Y2wwC4uO FWM1BSMeThTdNgE6sEGCGWBz0NlhInrs6gX9ur558zh2WrmIBeUJQhf0uNAokw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:19:57 -0000 On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:53:22PM +0000, Romain Tarti??re wrote: > New Revision: 566124 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/566124 > > Log: > New port: irc/catgirl > > ... > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > +# $FreeBSD$ > + > +post-install: > + ${STRIP_CMD} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/catgirl > + > +.if ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base || ${SSL_DEFAULT} == openssl > +LIB_DEPENDS+= libtls.so:security/libretls > +.endif I don't think this is right, or even allowed. Can't the code be made portable across all SSL flavors? ./danfe