From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Thu Jun 11 05:13:12 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E827034B19A
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49jBnz756Fz442c
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:13:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:13:10 -0600
References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de>
 <62d10000-e068-922e-23bd-f7a61e7a4e89@anatoli.ws>
 <ACE27C81-9437-41D6-BBD4-FA7A7B791428@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <6a4f6a15-ec43-03f6-1a41-a109e445f026@anatoli.ws>
 <f667e8f9-b279-a3ce-3fc4-224ba17f4bbb@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws>
 <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net>
 <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws>
 <e1f6623a-3b3c-a43e-446a-d41f20f69418@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net>
 <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu>
 <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com>
 <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de>
To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de>
Message-Id: <EA869B95-9D98-4ECC-9371-C57A0035BC32@kreme.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49jBnz756Fz442c
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.70)[-0.696]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.74)[-0.738]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.07)[0.070]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:13:13 -0000

On 10 Jun 2020, at 23:06, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> However, I assume that the use of "reply to all" is so convenient it =
is often preferred to "reply to mailing list", that's why sometimes =
replies are send "twice"=E2=80=A6

A smart MUA (is there one) you have a reply button that replied sender =
if the messages was directly to you, replied to list if the message was =
from a list, and made you hit a difficult chorded sequence of 47 keys in =
precise order in less than 4 seconds to reply to all.