From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 23:42:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB54521 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flat.berklix.org (flat.berklix.org [83.236.223.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B792CEA for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF141.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.241.65]) (authenticated bits=128) by flat.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0AMs1It002886; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:54:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0AMsblj047785; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:54:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0AMsPaQ094085; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:54:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201301102254.r0AMsPaQ094085@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: More request for feedback. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:48:23 CST." <50ECB047.4030503@missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:54:25 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:42:34 -0000 Stephen M wrote > Based on responses so far, I am assuming that no-one is using > ctm-cvs-cur any more. So I feel safe about deleting this in late > February. Fine. ( I was keeping quite, still using CVS & thus ctm-cvs-cur, cos I hadn't got round to trying svn from local repository for replacements for eg cvs -R export -r RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE src cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 ports cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 doc (maybe others were similarly lurking ?) Syntax examples would be welcome. > Is anyone still using ctm-src-4 or ctm-src-5? I'm still subscribed & scripts in place to update trees on every ctm stream, but though I dont have any FreeBSD-5 boxes. I do have >= 3 boxes with FreeBSD-4 that won't easily upgrade but yes: > Note that src-5 hasn't changed for three years, and src-4 for even > longer. (The updates on 9/23/2012 were just header changes due to > switching from cvs to svn.) Tracking 4 & 5 is a moot procedure, it might as well stop if consuming needed resources. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.