Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:50:28 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: araujo@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r309078 - head/x11-wm/bbkeys Message-ID: <20121217105028.GA37390@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZheoF6-oA4LdgtCtwFU238QSwr6W5oFcRWtYGBAOPbbhA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201212171018.qBHAIVGO065612@svn.freebsd.org> <CAOfEmZheoF6-oA4LdgtCtwFU238QSwr6W5oFcRWtYGBAOPbbhA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:29:07PM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > New Revision: 309078 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/309078 > > > > Log: > > - Trim Makefile header, NOPORTDOCS -> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS > > - Define LICENSE, drop article from COMMENT, small cleanups > > - Augment port description while I am here > > > > Approved by: maintainer (implicit) > > In my understand this update should have maintainer approvals! > Even that your changes improved it a lot, the maintainer should be > respected, or, the maintainer timeout should be respected. In this case, "implicit" means what it should: I've previously received approval from Andrew for his blackbox-related ports for this kinds of infrastructural changes, shall they be required. This commit does not change any user-visible logic of the port itself. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121217105028.GA37390>