From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 10:50:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C3A44E29; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:50:28 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: araujo@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r309078 - head/x11-wm/bbkeys Message-ID: <20121217105028.GA37390@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212171018.qBHAIVGO065612@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:50:28 -0000 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:29:07PM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > New Revision: 309078 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/309078 > > > > Log: > > - Trim Makefile header, NOPORTDOCS -> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS > > - Define LICENSE, drop article from COMMENT, small cleanups > > - Augment port description while I am here > > > > Approved by: maintainer (implicit) > > In my understand this update should have maintainer approvals! > Even that your changes improved it a lot, the maintainer should be > respected, or, the maintainer timeout should be respected. In this case, "implicit" means what it should: I've previously received approval from Andrew for his blackbox-related ports for this kinds of infrastructural changes, shall they be required. This commit does not change any user-visible logic of the port itself. ./danfe