Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:51:53 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Leon Christopher Dietrich <doralitze@chaotikum.org> Subject: Re: hw.vga.acpi_ignore_no_vga=1 for installation media Message-ID: <20731c15-415d-2260-5442-44c501387e4c@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <20190318102211.GR96870@kib.kiev.ua> References: <mailman.13.1552824000.329.freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> <ccfb7722-3703-2995-641d-256990a1c57d@chaotikum.org> <CANCZdfqd0C=vknLi9Yrr=odLwokg-oSmSw5XfmDB%2B=CdkhPK2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20190317173421.GN96870@kib.kiev.ua> <11d5849a-848d-5034-8062-7e07cd6c8d3f@grosbein.net> <20190318102211.GR96870@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
18.03.2019 17:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > That said, did anybody considered ignoring NO_VGA FACP flag on Silvermonts > only ? Or even better, gather SMBIOS identifications for affected BIOSes > and ignore the flag for them ? Is SMBIOS-bases blacklisting reliable considering future BIOS updates (including pre-installed)? When it comes to human-managed interactive installation, it seems for me more reliable to check real functions of VGA and ACPI flag than collecting black list.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20731c15-415d-2260-5442-44c501387e4c>