From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 03:26:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D27F16A4CE; Wed, 12 May 2004 03:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-49-130.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.49.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9801E43D1D; Wed, 12 May 2004 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BNqw2-000K0i-H9; Wed, 12 May 2004 12:26:01 +0200 Message-ID: <40A1FBB7.6080504@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 12:25:59 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <200405120849.i4C8n5PT030149@repoman.freebsd.org> <40A1F232.7020903@fillmore-labs.com> <1084355593.54941.13.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <1084355593.54941.13.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail Makefile ports/mail/postfix20 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:26:03 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V st, 12. 05. 2004 v 11:45, Oliver Eikemeier p=ED=B9e: >=20 >>>pav 2004/05/12 01:49:05 PDT >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> mail Makefile=20 >>> mail/postfix20 Makefile=20 >>> Log: >>> After repocopy from mail/postfix, add mail/postfix20 port with postf= ix 2.0.x >>> for people who don't want to update to 2.1.x right now. >> >>I guess >> >> LATEST_LINK=3D postfix20 >> >>would have been more appropriate than >> >> NO_LATEST_LINK=3D yes >> >>At least you could do >> >> pkg_add -r postfix20 >> >>instead of knowing the precise version number then. >=20 > I suppose pkg_add -r postfix20 is more unintuitive than pkg_add -r > postfix-2.0.20, but I don't see how this could break anything so let it= > be. That is not the way pkg_add and LATEST_LINK works. If you want to install= a package that has no LATEST_LINK set you have to specify the full URL, including your OS version. LATEST_LINK actually does some useful magic, and it's basically free, sin= ce you it will only add the overhead of one inode. So NO_LATEST_LINK should only be set by ports that are not expected to be installed by package use= rs, for example because they are of highly experimental nature. -Oliver