Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 20:17:01 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_AUTOMAKE directive Message-ID: <20000503201701.Z94890@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <vqc8zxrxgmm.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.org on Wed, May 03, 2000 at 06:12:49PM -0700 References: <200005031547.AAA26484@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <200005031601.BAA26617@pis.toba-cmt.ac.jp> <vqc8zxrxgmm.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 06:12:49PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > However, is it necessary? It doesn't seem like a whole lot of ports > use automake anyway. > > [snip] > > Well, maybe 6 is enough. What do others think? I'd like to see it go in. automake is already used by these ports, and it makes for consistency down the entire tool chain (automake, autoconf, libtool, configure) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000503201701.Z94890>