From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 2 12:28:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09529 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 May 1998 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA09418 for ; Sat, 2 May 1998 12:27:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA06575; Sat, 2 May 1998 15:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 15:26:52 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com Reply-To: spork To: am@f1.ru cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threads performance In-Reply-To: <199805011835.WAA00793@px.f1.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yeah, I had to do some ugly hacks to get mit-pthreads to work under 3.0, but we've seen much better performance and longer uptimes. We're coming up on a week without restarting it, which is a major landmark. Charles Sprickman spork@super-g.com ---- On Fri, 1 May 1998, Andrew Maltsev wrote: > > Any recommendations on what to do to get the best performance here? I'd > > give up a CPU if I could get more stability and an easier target for Monty > > to troubleshoot on. Anyone else here use mysql? Any opinions? Should I > > try again with MIT-pthreads? > > I'm using. And have no luck with freebsd's libc_r, so my mysql is > compiled with mit-threads. No problems - uptime is about month now - > except mit-thr doesn't support unix-sockets. > > px# mysqladmin st > > Uptime: 2257747 Running threads: 1 Questions: 440811 Reloads: 3 Open tables: 33 > > It's on db of about 12 megs and 30'000 records. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message