From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 12:33:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3631116A4D1 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D670A43D1F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:33:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883F75482B; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:33:10 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3AD626D455; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:33:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:33:10 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "Andrew L. Neporada" Message-ID: <20040318203310.GA51002@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , "Andrew L. Neporada" , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <20040318201727.GA14840@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040318201727.GA14840@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest openssl vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:33:13 -0000 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:17:27PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote: > Is it true that (dynamic) binaries are vulnerable if and only if they are > linked with libssl.so.3, not with libcrypt or libcrypto? Yes, the bug is in libssl. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org