Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 23:14:12 +0900 From: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Qt-2.0.2 (Re: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk) Message-ID: <19991001231412S.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <199908300703.AAA46720@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <001501bef2ac$fd7d5a20$6310a8c0@imurar.nttdtec.co.jp> <199908300703.AAA46720@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > * Qt says > * 2-VER_MAJ > * 0-VER_MIN > * 1-VER_PATCH > * > * so, next Qt-2.0.2, Qt-2.0.3... shuld be compatible, I think. > * Qt renames but directory name remains, it seems strange, isn't it? > * I think qt20 is better. > > Hmm. I distinctly remembering having to create qt141 and then qt142 > because they were not quite compatible to qt140. > > Anyway, I made a copy to qt201 for now. If the next version is > compatible, we can always call that one qt20 and erase qt201. Qt-2.0.2 has been released, and I'm ready to commit now. It has a compatibility with old one. Then, what is the next step? --- R. Imura To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991001231412S.imura>