Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:01:10 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: FreeBSD - <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: perl qstn... Message-ID: <20100407030110.GE25911@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <4BBBB305.4070206@ibctech.ca> References: <20100406015544.GA21119@guilt.hydra> <20100406132049.641b9edf@gumby.homeunix.com> <86wrwkiunp.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <2EE33758-C39C-41DC-B6A8-B34CF6B3B25A@mac.com> <86k4sk1mle.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <66F97B7C-9D27-452B-BCC8-30C960599AE0@mac.com> <86d3yc2zib.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86A6FD8C-EF54-4B61-957E-A88A7272F7C0@mac.com> <868w902sp0.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4BBBB305.4070206@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SWTRyWv/ijrBap1m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:17:41PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.04.06 17:10, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >=20 > > Now, on the other hand, emacs rules, vi sucks. :-) :-) >=20 > ok, ok. I was on the side of Perl, and was content following this > thread, but now I don't like you anymore :P >=20 > heh ;) >=20 > Steve I'm willing to let the emacs users have their emacs, and to enjoy my vi. I guess the longer name (emacs) suits people who like pressing more buttons to accomplish the same amount of work anyway. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --SWTRyWv/ijrBap1m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAku79XYACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVuwACfdpZY9vmcnyjUyOl++ohG4osM OEQAn2AfhAC9bWTtfEUmba3QSC2X932O =oBZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SWTRyWv/ijrBap1m--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100407030110.GE25911>