From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 28 16:08:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FFD106566B for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patpro@patpro.net) Received: from rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [193.30.227.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695E58FC0A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A19E88 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:45 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at patpro.net Received: from amavis-at-patpro.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rack.patpro.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AACTnEtcdYHi for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:43 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <1D0AE4B4-278A-4325-BFED-07B04BE316E1@patpro.net> From: Patrick Proniewski To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-11--733951134; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:42 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ZFS licensing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:08:47 -0000 --Apple-Mail-11--733951134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Well, I understand this list is mainly interested in implementation and tuning, but I'm sure some of you are well informed about licensing issues. Recently, Apple giving up on ZFS has made the headlines. *It appears* to be related to the NetApp vs. Sun case (). And *it appears* Sun tried to impose a license that would make Apple responsible for IP infringement in case Sun would lose against NetApp. It makes me wonder about the FreeBSD port of ZFS. Do you have further informations about the licensing of ZFS technology, and about the case of FreeBSD port ? regards, patpro --Apple-Mail-11--733951134--