From owner-cvs-all Thu Dec 30 2:42:56 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9B61523A; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 02:42:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@d60-025.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.25]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06611; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 02:42:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id CAA50494; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 02:42:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 02:42:49 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org Cc: Steve Price , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/gperf Makefile ports/devel/gperf/files md5 ports/devel/gperf/patches patch-aa ports/devel/gperf/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <19991230024249.A38770@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <199912290909.BAA54635@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <199912290909.BAA54635@freefall.freebsd.org>; from steve@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 01:09:41AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Log: > Adding gperf version 2.7 > Generates perfect hash functions for sets of keywords. > > PR: 12904 > Submitted by: Dirk Meyer Feh. Dare I ask why this was done as a port, rather than a PR being submitted that `gperf' in the base system should be up graded? If we keep having ports that duplicate much of the GNU tools we have in the base src tree, why don't we just remove them all from the base tree and do the package thing. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message