From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 20 11:15: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396F414D1C for ; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:14:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id 2D0789B25; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 14:14:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FA7BA21; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 14:14:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 14:14:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: cdf.lists@pawn.primelocation.net To: Byung Yang Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cpu name In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote: > I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu > name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag > before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower > the optimization flag to -O? > > On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > > -On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang (freebsd@nowcool.dhs.org) wrote: > > >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any > > >suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug) > > >I did not modify any of the source codes. > > > > I think someone else suggested lowering the optimisation level. > > > > Have you tried that yet? > > Has anyone referenced this problem with kern/12896 ? ----- Chris D. Faulhaber | All the true gurus I've met never System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one, and always Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message