From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Nov 8 20:10:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E920F37B4CF for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA94AMg17784; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:10:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA35945; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:10:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011090410.VAA35945@harmony.village.org> To: Tony Maher Subject: Re: rsh problems Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 14:58:46 +1100." <200011090358.OAA09388@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> References: <200011090358.OAA09388@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 21:10:22 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200011090358.OAA09388@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> Tony Maher writes: : > Can anyone confirm that rshd/rlogind works on a 4.2beta machine? : : Ok! Thanks to Sean O'Connell who points out that changing : : rshd auth required pam_deny.so : to : rshd auth sufficient pam_deny.so : : fixes the problem. : : Should this be changed in CVS or is there some reason why it should remain : 'required'? I think it should be changed back. We're going to get a lot of questions about this, I think. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message