From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 21 22:41:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816CD620 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.net.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6E9823 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:41:13 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEANdi7FGDaFve/2dsb2JhbABahAuDCr0mgSx0gk6BCwINGQJfiCOWRY5+kG+BKI46gxiBIQOpKoMuIIFu X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,715,1367985600"; d="scan'208";a="40819562" Received: from muskoka.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.222]) by esa-annu.net.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2013 18:41:12 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00DBB411A for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:41:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:41:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: FreeBSD Current Message-ID: <1345133141.362200.1374446472640.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> Subject: NFSv4.1 server for testing/review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.1_GA_2790 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/7.2.1_GA_2790) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:41:14 -0000 Hi, Just in case anyone is interested, I have put an experimental NFSv4.1 server in the svn repository under: projects/nfsv4.1-server It lacks required support for backchannels. However, since it never issues delegations at this point, it seems to work ok against the extant NFSv4.1 clients that I have had the opportunity to test it against. I will be adding backchannel support sometime soon and hope to merge it into head sometime after that. rick