Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:01:53 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r550188 - head/print/harfbuzz Message-ID: <a6xc-1t0e-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202009261419.08QEJFS3051904@repo.freebsd.org> (Tobias C. Berner's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:19:15 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <202009261419.08QEJFS3051904@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@FreeBSD.org> writes: > There are minor differences in the tarballs. > > Bump revision to ensure consistency. As long as the produced package is the same there was no point in forcing users to rebuild it via PORTREVISION bump. In poudriere this also implies rebuilding all consumers. > -PORTREVISION?= 0 > +PORTREVISION?= 1 Did you mean to bump only master but not slave ports? $ fgrep PORTREVISION print/harfbuzz-*/Makefile print/harfbuzz-hb-view/Makefile:PORTREVISION= 0 print/harfbuzz-icu/Makefile:PORTREVISION= 0 > +MASTER_SITES= https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/releases/download/${DISTVERSION}/ Why not replace harfbuzz with ${PORTNAME}, so MASTER_SITES is generic?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a6xc-1t0e-wny>