From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 13:25:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329BB1065670 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFEF8FC1E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5Isx-0004vl-MX for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:26 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <4BD1935B.6070602@icyb.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100329 Thunderbird/3.0.3 In-Reply-To: <4BD1935B.6070602@icyb.net.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:25:39 -0000 On 04/23/10 14:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/04/2010 12:28 Alexander Best said the following: >> has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've been using >> ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss burncd(8). i >> found it to be much easier to use and less buggy than cdrecord(1). > > burncd for CAM (SCSI, ATAPI) will be something very close to cdrecord or growisofs. How different are the interfaces? I mean - since they talk to the same device, are the differences just API / superficial or is there something fundamentally different that cannot be implemented within burncd? (I agree that burncd is very nice to have and more logical to use than cdrecord.)