From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 06:21:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF011065670 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@dino.sk) Received: from loki.netlab.sk (loki.netlab.sk [84.245.65.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856D78FC1A for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atom.dino.sk (ttxa118.ttx-net.sk [193.110.186.118]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by loki.netlab.sk with ESMTPSA; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:17:20 +0100 id 00033CB1.4ED71BF0.0000C8BA Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 07:20:40 +0100 From: Milan Obuch To: Sergey Kandaurov Message-ID: <20111201072040.7c76ba2d@atom.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: References: <20111126084402.1afbfc16@atom.dino.sk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 X-Face: ak5rwz4-aUa>hPFZlcg,bXxn.(TN}e9DGFrKU\.i_'B[&5=pAd9o"j)5VSUYW:BRQG#^42Ev$Il|; Ztn=,C X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 8.2-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maxim Khitrov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:21:08 -0000 On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov > > wrote: > >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source > >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying > >>> what to csup > >>> > >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > >>> > >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just > >>> > >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile > >>> > >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config > >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two > >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to > >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older > >>> version sources. > >>> > >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make > >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... > >>> > >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I > >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... > >>> > >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > >> > >> Hi. > >> > >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. > >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. > > > > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm > > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points > > to HEAD. > > Yep, sure. > I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. > It works for me now as expected, thanks. Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. Regards, Milan