From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 07:42:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678E0106566B for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.c2i.net [212.247.154.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48BD8FC15 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:42:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=We2KpSpXIp7zua8olfHtbA6oPL2p8ijoExYxXUNIRvU= c=1 sm=1 a=SvYTsOw2Z4kA:10 a=IC3tPse-fb0A:10 a=b3QVEWO9ABQA:10 a=WQU8e4WWZSUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=3rZIGIF3AnKcUkR4-NcA:9 a=5HgKeDz52PopTRKQQQEA:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=JSCAq1iC0rcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 172434536; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:32:26 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:29:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5 %V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( :AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:03:20 +0000 Cc: Volodymyr Kostyrko , "Hartmann, O." , "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:42:31 -0000 On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > This website should be brushed up or taken offline! > > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html > > I think this one would better look like list of major features with os > comparison, like: > > = Networking = > * IPv6: major support, best stack around. > * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. > ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). > > = Data storage = > * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux > has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has > dynamic disks since XP (?features). > > = SMP = > * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some > rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like > DragonflyBSD and QNX). > And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. --HPS