From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:32:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1405F106566C for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934728FC22 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7ALWFoq011727 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:32:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D8689BA99; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:32:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:32:11 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100810213211.GA61196@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20100809180022.GA33596@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: chflags(1) unaware utilties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:32:18 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:22:47PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 9 August 2010 14:00, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > chflags(1) mentions that a few utilities including pax(1) aren't chflags > > aware yet. is there a list of all those utilties available somewhere? > > in fact the pax(1) manual states that `pax -p e` will "preserve > > everything". this is plain wrong! >=20 > AFIK, pax is a POSIX thing, and as such working > correctly or sanely would violate its posix nature. > (POSIX is an anagram of "Pox? Si!") >=20 > Is cpio chflags-aware? To the best of my knowledge the _only_ way to be sure you have backed up _a= ll_ possible features (flags, extended attributes &c) of a UFS filesystem is to use dump(8) & restore(8). Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxhxVsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUOCgCfcRPa4+Pck87be0xJ7bgiITGU GZoAniYweSenekkVqUBRGMvCakITLyls =Khjt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--