From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 21:02:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB00106564A; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271A98FC08; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.local (71-218-27-233.hlrn.qwest.net [71.218.27.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1DL2Urw074614; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4995DFE5.1020205@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:29 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:02:50 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> I have committed a fix for this problem for FreeBSD 8-CURRENT as of SVN >> revision 188570. FreeBSD 7-STABLE will be updated with the fix in a few >> days once I've gotten confirmation that the fix works and doesn't cause >> any adverse side-effects. Anyone wanting to help in this validation >> effort should apply the attached patch to their kernel source tree and >> recompile. Please contact me directly by email to report if the problem >> is fixed for you. > > I notice that write performance on an ESXi 3.5 hosted system is doubled, > but read performance remains the same (in bonnie++). > On a CISS system there is no significant change. > bonnie is an unreliable tool for measuring performance. Scott