From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 25 9: 7:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7417437B423 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:07:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E77D218C98; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:07:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:07:23 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Lyndon Nerenberg Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Message-ID: <20010525110723.C9939@spawn.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Lyndon Nerenberg , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010524132144.A14177@shade.nectar.com> <200105241856.f4OIuSt00994@orthanc.ab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200105241856.f4OIuSt00994@orthanc.ab.ca>; from lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:56:28PM -0600 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:56:28PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > As a more general solution I have an inetd that groks AF_UNIX. You > would have to add chroot/jail support to it, though, and some would > argue that that's making inetd a bit featureful. I dunno. Somehow it makes more sense to me than adding AF_UNIX support to telnet. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message