From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 7:20:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from picusnet.com (mail.picusnet.com [207.7.90.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7A437B61C for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wdf@picusnet.com) Received: from picusnet.com [209.96.235.66] by picusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.05) id AEE3110200A6; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: <38FC6F12.2EE7EC03@picusnet.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:20:02 -0400 From: "William D. Freeman" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Quake World port to use under FreeBSD 4.0 References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------81C822E17E3745D159A19187" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --------------81C822E17E3745D159A19187 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Linux emulation should probably be fine. I'm pretty sure BSDi would be, too. The BSDi version might work better under -CURRENT i think because as far as i can tell i think they are merging source bases in the -CURRENT branch for FreeBSD and BSD/OS (if i am wrong, please correct me....i usualy don't know what's going on). However, since i regard games like that as a waste of my time (except that Doom kicks ass..), i wouldn't have any working knowledg of Quake anything under anything. "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" wrote: > Anyway, the question is: which is better to use from those three? Is BSDi > emulation better that linux's? -- William D. Freeman [wdf@picusnet.com] http://members.xoom.com/EvilGNU -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GU d? s+:++ a--- C++ UB+++ P+ L- E W++ N- o-- K---- w--- O---- M- V-- PS--- PE++ Y-- PGP---- t+ 5-- X++ R tv b+ --------------81C822E17E3745D159A19187 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Linux emulation should probably be fine.  I'm pretty sure BSDi would be, too.  The BSDi version might work better under -CURRENT i think because as far as i can tell i think they are merging source bases in the -CURRENT branch for FreeBSD and BSD/OS (if i am wrong, please correct me....i usualy don't know what's going on).  However, since i regard games like that as a waste of my time (except that Doom kicks ass..), i wouldn't have any working knowledg of Quake anything under anything.
 
 
 

"Alexey N. Dokuchaev" wrote:

Anyway, the question is: which is better to use from those three?  Is BSDi
emulation better that linux's?
-- 
 William D. Freeman [wdf@picusnet.com]
http://members.xoom.com/EvilGNU
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GU d? s+:++ a--- C++ UB+++ P+ L- E W++ N- o-- K---- w--- 
O---- M- V-- PS--- PE++ Y-- PGP---- t+ 5-- X++ R tv b+
  --------------81C822E17E3745D159A19187-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message