From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 28 17:25:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA07623 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 17:25:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from Kitten.mcs.com (Kitten.mcs.com [192.160.127.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA07615 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 17:25:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from font@Jupiter.Mcs.Net) Received: from Jupiter.Mcs.Net (font@Jupiter.mcs.net [192.160.127.88]) by Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id TAA08377; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:25:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (font@localhost) by Jupiter.Mcs.Net (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id TAA12675; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:25:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:25:21 -0600 (CST) From: Font To: Doug White cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top in 2.2.5R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Font wrote: > > I was testing 2.2.5R a few moments ago when I noticed that the top(1) > > command had output all zeroes for %user/nice/system/interrupt/idle and all > > zeroes for TIME/WCPU/CPU. Is this a known problem, or is it just me? I > > believe the last install on another computer with RELENG-2.2-970911 didn't > > have this particular problem. Hints on fixing it also welcome. :-) > > Top is probably out of date. Try upgrading. Hmm, what is there to upgrade to after 2.2.5R? This is /usr/bin/top in the bin distribution, installed by default, not anything installed afterwards. Or do you mean something else? Thanks for your reply to this very minor question.