From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 19:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BB016A4DA; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4EF43D6A; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:58:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7KJtBUZ062430; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:55:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:55:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060820.135517.1683995254.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <64652.1156057112@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20060819200148.S952@odysseus.silby.com> <64652.1156057112@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:55:12 -0600 (MDT) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, silby@silby.com, cvs-all@freebsd.org, itetcu@freebsd.org, cognet@freebsd.org Subject: Re: __FreeBSD_version was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _timeval.h user.h src/sys/arm/include _types.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:58:16 -0000 In message: <64652.1156057112@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <20060819200148.S952@odysseus.silby.com>, Mike Silbersack writes: : > : >On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : >Maybe this has been discussed in the past, but why don't we just have : >__FreeBSD_version auto-incremented every day? It would be great for : >situations where we currently use it, and it's also be great for bug : >reports. : : The traditional argument was "it's CVS bloat!" The other problem that comes into play is if someone updates only part of the tree (say the kernel) and not this file. Then you have version skew.. of course, you'd have that regardless... Warner