From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 05:01:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D7B16A41F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from wbm7.pair.net (wbm7.pair.net [209.68.4.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10B43D72 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: by wbm7.pair.net (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6392A10560; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:01:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 63.147.253.154 ([63.147.253.154]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user silby@silby.com) by webmail7.pair.com with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:01:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <44314.63.147.253.154.1137474098.squirrel@webmail7.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <43CC65BC.9040005@nano.net> References: <43CC59E7.6080505@nano.net> <015901c61b15$898648a0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <43CC65BC.9040005@nano.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:01:38 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Silbersack" To: "Steve Suhre" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Named requests filling up T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:01:49 -0000 > Thanks Matt, > > The answer to both is no. The domain doesn't resolve either > (v.tn.co.za). It looks like the source IP changes too...sigh.... I tried > a whois on the source IP and it was not found, so it may be spoofed? Or > someone has a very messed up server... There was a thread on bugtraq about this, you're either being attacked or are being used to attack someone else. Reconfigure BIND so that it ignores recursive queries originating from outside your network - at least that will save your outbound bandwidth. Mike "Silby" Silbersack