From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 7 14:40:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA22174 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 14:40:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA22127 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 14:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id KAA17641 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 10:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA10340; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:19:00 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199611071819.LAA10340@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: still no response To: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:18:59 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611070342.VAA10194@brasil.moneng.mei.com> from "Joe Greco" at Nov 6, 96 09:42:51 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The inetd already has a session limit. It's just not per service, it's > > per inetd, and it's compiled in. > > I thought that was a session spawning rate limit - not a session number > limit. Maybe I am wrong. The spawning rate limit is a soft limit. The session number limit is set external to the inetd (think: number of child processes). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.