From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 26 04:52:21 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA3B16A46C
	for <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7063913C481
	for <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8Q4E0YG043743;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:14:01 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <46F9DC89.598B7C64@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:14:01 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <200709251820.l8PIK6Um084479@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20070925.125124.74698669.imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does notwork
X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB <freebsd-usb.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:52:21 -0000

Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> Have you tried porting -current's umodem driver back to stable?  I
> think it would work a lot better...

I've glanced at CURRENT's umodem and there is no that code
allowing to work with devices without CM descriptor using UNION instead...
NetBSD has that code since 2005.

Do you think CURRENT's umodem would be useble in this case?

Eugene