From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 17 15:04:45 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22690
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sneezy.sri.com (sneezy.sri.com [128.18.40.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA22680
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from swift.rmlnet by sneezy.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA22300; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:00:58 -0800
Received: by swift.rmlnet (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA26031; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:03:43 -0800
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:03:43 -0800
Message-Id: <199702172303.PAA26031@swift.rmlnet>
From: Nate Williams  <nate@sneezy.sri.com>
To: joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject: Re: ep0 in GENERIC
In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970217194551.j@ida.>
References: <Mutt.19970217194551.j@ida.>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Why don't we use the following config line for ep0 (3C509)?
> 
> device ep0 at isa? port ? net irq ? vector epintr

It won't negatively affect the pccard code, so no concerns here.


Nate