Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:56:54 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configuring ports via Makefile.local Message-ID: <200407302156.55227.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200407302155.03630.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20040727122823.40c6c3c5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040730194005.GB768@galgenberg.net> <200407302155.03630.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_HgqCB+uM3bPYFx8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 July 2004 21:55, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday 30 July 2004 21:40, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > But since you > > would have to put the options in make.conf anyway to make them work with > > portinstall, what's the point of OPTIONS then? > > You wouldn't. The point of OPTIONS is exactly to unclutter your make.conf > (and advertising available switches). Of course you need to set them > interactively at least once (just like you need to edit make.conf at least > once if you'd rather avoid using OPTIONS). =46orgot to add: Optionally setting OPTIONS ahead of all the compiling is a= =20 feature of OPTIONSNG, IIRC. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_HgqCB+uM3bPYFx8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBCqgHXhc68WspdLARAnj2AJ9w0kmlKYaKq76NK9JysntnFEMOUQCfbJUm hZD5qNiIwgPtXWTaRPAVuQU= =dgcI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_HgqCB+uM3bPYFx8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407302156.55227.michaelnottebrock>