Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:16:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416120.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FE1BDEC.1040705@gmail.com> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=%2BwEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0S=tsYfUhuL6BsUPu7u%2BtB47gMGGTp6Abevh0_1CaayA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201024140.40030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAH3a3KWy9Qzf5BOUGWM3TLZe5XV3gKz0WhWQJ1q8j9F3FV7hYg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201054480.23394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE19BFC.7030304@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE1BDEC.1040705@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> speed estimates. there are a difference between speed estimate and actual speed - and i talk about the latter only. > > Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc now. And they > are fine with that one. their problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416120.24484>