Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:38:57 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? Message-ID: <20000828143857.B18862@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <14762.56098.997893.119112@guru.mired.org>; from mwm@mired.org on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 04:35:30PM -0500 References: <17477616@toto.iv> <14762.56098.997893.119112@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> [000828 14:36] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein writes: > > * Steve Lewis <nepolon@systray.com> [000828 11:53] wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > What do you recommend for a web server if Apache is "entirely useless" may > > > > > I ask? > > > > Zues, thttpd, roxen, there's a lot out there that are a lot faster. > > > > > > > > Supposedly Zues is king. > > > Do you happen to know what these do better than apache? > > "everything", apache needs a process to handle each request > > Huh? That stopped being true a *long* time ago. Last time I looked at > the default config, the number of requests a process would handle was > set very low, but that is trivially fixable. I'm aware of the way that it keeps the processes around for to grab the next request, it's still not good enough. It's the MaxRequestsPerChild or something 'tunable'. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000828143857.B18862>