From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 05:31:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0BF106566B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leccine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE188FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1553059fxm.36 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h+Nc4sI/nk7CNwNbWXPEt8GUAXI6nqYCi8vaLqx/dIk=; b=QrW2ycLzZzqW6kTFJbQZwiibzVlWp6Yl1NbeQvryFkKekJ/LeYe3mpgw1KC0kv6z6n GDjirsgvVn/RY9Rs+LO6et1rqI39v2ZswWFvT3LB/UHgzC9O2jaOypy0C3ZYnzR74YIc W9E2+vWcDUuka5h8HtbAg68BNcFtan0I7ujPE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JKUfwR9MXcIEru6frDVrBf68fnkbvfD3T0MPHQCtCoZsw4O73fy5qTaPGnKO+DGtgY ZeGZuhxV8KhZD/0Gu9/SjFYdVjtbK68obNXQPOUP+YcGxECzBlt/j9SqQ0hKedA/ryeR RFb9b2MzXxfvXBNvqcz0hQhFkMDGKk7ZOxxjM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.19 with SMTP id 19mr4911235bkl.151.1254288699556; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC2968C.6020206@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com> <458792029.144491254249841202.JavaMail.root@shee.earlham.edu> <3bbf2fe10909291209h3c2b1c57se68e6030c2a5a044@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2968C.6020206@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:31:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SXN0duFu?= To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:31:41 -0000 makes no sense to stay with freebsd for zfs: http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ I think this will not change soon. ZFS is, at this moment, the only > thing that keeps me with FreeBSD. In every other case, serving, number > crunching (oh, we need a lot of I/O performance in those number > crunching environments) and even simple desktop, Linux, mostly Ubuntu > and RedHat, outperforms FreeBSD. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- the sun shines for all