From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 12 23:57:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA26633 for current-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:57:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA26627 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA25225; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 08:59:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.3/8.6.9) id IAA05591; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 08:57:38 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199701130757.IAA05591@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Re: a last word on last In-Reply-To: from J Wunsch at "Jan 12, 97 09:54:35 pm" To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 08:57:38 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Reply-To: Christoph Kukulies X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > > Well, I zeroed wtmp/utmp several times in the past and the problem > > came back. This may because of the various changes to the wtmp/utmp thing. > > There has only been a single change yet. > > You can also use src/tools/3.0-upgrade/cvs-wtmp. I did that a couple of times and either cvs-wtmp barfed at some entries or it didn't work for some other reasons. > > > Anyway, yes, it looks ok now after deleting/touching wtmp/utmp again. > > Though some entries will have to accumulate still to get a better picture. > > It looks that something is still writing in the wrong format, probably > third-party software. Maybe Xaccel? But why do we pile up obstacles for running third party software? I don't expect that Xinside care for holding ready versions for pre and post 2.2 FreeBSD. I know that the wtmp/utmp issues have been discussed widely but a clearing word on this issue would really be helpful. What is the idea to cope with this problem? > > -- > cheers, J"org > > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) > --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de