Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:12:12 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r322444 - head/Tools/scripts Message-ID: <08cbb4c709544cad3671c093558910bb@mail.adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkE4bJ%2Bz3miKkDUrJqCgtetgJFX=qHv4M6=M7D9mKbuXQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201307071532.r67FWZTH036372@svn.freebsd.org> <51D98A76.7090505@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=UWEC%2Bsn6SU4-7nipODxK83LQteQi-3F6a9dr-DM3yeA@mail.gmail.com> <51DB0777.8080300@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgkE4bJ%2Bz3miKkDUrJqCgtetgJFX=qHv4M6=M7D9mKbuXQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013/07/08 15:04, Eitan Adler wrote: >>>>> Deleted: >>>>> head/Tools/scripts/dialog4ports.sh >>> >>> By the way, can we move this script out of Tools/. It doesn't >>> really >>> belong there. >> >> Where do you propose? > > A few options with no preference for any particular one: > (a) Mk/ even though it isn't actually a .mk file. > (b) Tools/infrastructure is also okay. > (c) as part of the d4p tarball / port > > Tools/scripts is primarily third party utilities so its not as obvious > that there are critical files in the directory. Agreed, if I were to check out a "minimal" tree I would not think to include Tools. I'd think Mk/ would be a good place for it---checking out Mk/ should give you all the pieces you need, and dialog4ports.sh is now a critical part of the ports build system. # Adam --- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08cbb4c709544cad3671c093558910bb>