From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 10 12:24:34 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA19472 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 12:24:34 -0700 Received: from tserv.lodgenet.com (root@dial2.iw.net [204.157.148.51]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA19449 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 12:23:10 -0700 Received: from jake.lodgenet.com (jake.lodgenet.com [204.124.120.30]) by tserv.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA03558; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:19:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jake.lodgenet.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA26570; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:20:20 -0500 Message-Id: <199507101920.OAA26570@jake.lodgenet.com> X-Authentication-Warning: jake.lodgenet.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6 4/21/95 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: mpp@legarto.minn.net, jspringr@tribeca.ios.com Subject: Re: pppd NOT AVAILABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:20:19 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Why don't we change pppd with the following patch to give a > better error message? This question seems to come up a lot > here and in the newsgroups, and the current error message isn't > really very clear as to what the problem is. Or maybe even change pppd to modload itself an interface from /lkm/if_ppp_mod.o? > > -- > Mike Pritchard > mpp@legarto.minn.net > "Go that way. Really fast. If something gets in your way, turn" > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com erich@rrnet.com